Environment as a Service blueprinting vs. Terraform

<div class="hs-featured-image-wrapper">
<a href="http://blog.quali.com/blog/environment-as-a-service-blueprinting-vs.-terraform" title="" class="hs-featured-image-link"> <img src="https://blog.quali.com/hubfs/EaaS_Blueprinting_vs_Terraform_Pascal-01.png" alt="EaaS_Blueprinting_vs_Terraform_Pascal-01" class="hs-featured-image" style="width:auto !important; max-width:50%; float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;"> </a>
</div>
<p>Whether you are a software architect, a developer, or a DevOps engineer, integrating your application into the cloud, understanding the constructs of your favorite cloud provider, and adopting the latest technologies is probably already your day-to-day. But when the rubber hits the road, modeling your application in the cloud can be a time-consuming, error-prone process.</p>
<p>Not the most judicious investment of resources to advance your organization's agenda for application digital transformation.</p>
<p>In this article, we will review and contrast a traditional, Infrastructure as Code approach using Terraform, with an alternative, time-saving approach using Environment as a Service and CloudShell Colony.</p>
<img src="https://track.hubspot.com/__ptq.gif?a=480344&amp;k=14&amp;r=http%3A%2F%2Fblog.quali.com%2Fblog%2Fenvironment-as-a-service-blueprinting-vs.-terraform&amp;bu=http%253A%252F%252Fblog.quali.com%252Fblog&amp;bvt=rss" alt="" width="1" height="1" style="min-height:1px!important;width:1px!important;border-width:0!important;margin-top:0!important;margin-bottom:0!important;margin-right:0!important;margin-left:0!important;padding-top:0!important;padding-bottom:0!important;padding-right:0!important;padding-left:0!important; ">